mfp: Extensible X++: Chain of Command

[ax_mct]

По ходу серийного маньяка я нашел - это Пондопиддан.

Из переписки в коментариях.
https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/mfp...in-of-command/

Цитата:

Adding a parameter (optional or not) to a non-final method is a breaking change;

Цитата:

Michael Fruergaard Pontoppidan
July 5, 2017 at 3:01 pm
If next is not mandatory – then chain-of-command is conceptual identical to overlayering (without all the tooling). It would allow any one to replace literally any piece of code with their own implementation. Given the goal is to ensure seamless upgrades then we cannot allow a generic extension capability offering replacement semantics.

I agree, there are cases where it would make sense to not call next – for those we’ll need to refactor the code to support the extensions.

По ходу четко все сказал. Приказано расстрелять. Всякие надежды - бессмысленны.